当前位置:高中试题 > 英语试题 > 题材分类 > 阅读理解。     Rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a major cause of...
题目
题型:山东省模拟题难度:来源:
阅读理解。     Rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a major cause of climate change, and now a new
study has confirmed that atmospheric CO2 is also affecting the ocean chemistry and potentially harming
sea life.
     Montana State University scientist Robert Dore has been researching the water in the Pacific Ocean for
almost two decades.
     "We"ve been going to the same spot in the Pacific Ocean, and we try and characterize long-term change
in the open ocean environment. And one of the key things that we measure is CO2 levels. And we"ve been
able to record this increasing quantity of atmospheric CO2 into the ocean."
     Scientists expected that as atmospheric CO2 increased, more and more of the carbon dioxide would be
absorbed into the ocean, affecting the chemical balance of the sea water, with a potentially harmful impact
on shellfish and coral in particular.
     "As carbon dioxide dissolves (溶解) in the water or seawater in this case, it forms a weak acid, carbonic
acid," Dore explains. "And therefore, as the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere goes up and that
exchanges with the surface seawater, it drives the pH down, and makes it more acidic."
     The seawater Dore and his colleagues have analyzed confirms what the theory predicts.
     The effect was particularly striking at about 250 meters down, and again at 500 meters. Dore and his
colleagues came up with two possible explanations. It could be that surface water picked up CO2 and then
moved to those depths. Or there could be a biological explanation.
     "It"s important to realize that the oceans are really becoming acidic. And it could have negative impacts
on a whole variety of sea life from fish to coral. It"s potentially catastrophic." 1. What can be the best title of the passage?[     ]
A. Sea Life Facing Danger
B. Scientist Researching Seawater
C. Oceans Becoming More Acidic
D. Climate Change Affecting Seawater 2. With the increase of atmospheric CO2, _____. [     ]
A. more corals will appear in the sea
B. the surface water is becoming warmer
C. the chemical balance of the seawater is affected
D. the pH of the ocean out here has been increasing 3. Which of the following shows the process of the impact of atmospheric CO2 on sea life?
    a. Sea life is endangered.
    b. CO2 goes into the surface water.
    c. The ocean chemistry is affected.
    d. CO2 decreases the pH and makes the seawater more acidic.
    e. CO2 levels in the atmosphere go up. [     ]
A. a→b→c→d→e
B. e→b→c→d→a
C. a→e→b→c→d
D. e→d→c→b→a4. Scientist Robert Dore came to the conclusion based on _____. [     ]
A. his research and analysis
B. the expectation of other scientists
C. some former theory
D. a major cause of climate change 5. What does the passage want to tell us most? [     ]
A. It takes time to make a scientific study.
B. Atmospheric CO2 is doing harm to sea life.
C. Robert Dore is a committed and serious scientist.
D. Measures should be taken to prevent the potential catastrophe.
答案
1-5: ACBAD
核心考点
试题【阅读理解。     Rising levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere are a major cause of】;主要考察你对题材分类等知识点的理解。[详细]
举一反三
阅读下面短文,请根据短文后的要求进行答题。(请注意问题后的字数要求)      [l]Compared to people with bad attitudes, people _____ are less likely to suffer from colds. It"s possible
that being positive helps the body fight illnesses.
     [2]In a previous study, people who tended to be cheerful and lively were least likely to develop coughs
and other cold symptoms. People who showed positive feelings were also less likely to mention symptoms
to their doctors, even when medical tests detected those symptoms.
     [3]Those findings were interesting, but they didn"t prove that a person"s attitude affects whether he or
she gets sick.
Instead, it was still possible that a person"s underlying personality is what matters.
     [4]Evidence suggests, for instance, that certain people are naturally more likely to be outgoing and
optimistic, with high self-esteem and a sense of control over life. This would mean that who we are, not
how we feel, ultimately decides our chances of catching colds.
     [5]To figure out which mattered more, personality or emotions, the researchers interviewed 193 healthy
adults. The results showed that everyone in the study was equally likely to get infected. Their symptoms,
however, differed depending on the types of emotions that they had reported over the previous fortnight.
     [6]Among those who reported good moods and had been infected with the flu virus, for example, 28
percent developed coughs and stuffy noses. On the other hand, those symptoms struck 41 percent of people
who had been less positive.
     [7]Scientists argue about whether negative emotions or positive emotions have a stronger effect on how
healthy we are. For now, it can"t hurt to look on the bright side more often than not! 1. What"s the main idea of the passage? (Please answer within 10 words)
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
2. Fillin the blank with proper words in the first paragraph (Please answer within 10 words) 
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
3. Which sentence in the passage can be replaced by the following one? But, their symPtoms were closely 
    related to the emotions they had claimed to have in the last two weeks.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
4. Translate the underlined sentence in the third paragraph into proper Chinese.
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
5. Suppose one of your friends had got infected with the HINI flu give him/her at least three pieces of advice.
    (Please answer within 30 words)
    _____________________________________________________________________________________
题型:山东省模拟题难度:| 查看答案
阅读理解诶。

     In their book Time to Eat the Dog: The Real Guide to Sustainable Living, Robert and Brenda Vale say
keeping a medium-sized dog has the same ecological impact as driving 10000 km a year in a 4.6 liter Land
Cruiser.
     "We"re not actually saying it is time to eat the dog. We"re just saying that we need to think about and
know the ecological impact of some of the things we do and that we take for granted."
     Constructing and driving the jeep for a year requires 0.41 hectares of land, while growing and
manufacturing a dog"s food takes about O.84 hectares-or l.1 hectares in the case of a large dog such as a
German shepherd.
     Convincing flesh-eating cats and dogs to go vegetarian for the sake of the planet is a non-starter, the
Vales say. Instead they recommend keeping "greener", smaller, and more sustainable pets, such as goldfish,
chickens or rabbits.
     The book"s playful title, and serious suggestion that pet animals may be usefully "recycled", by being eaten
by their owners or turned into pet food when they die, may not appeal to animal fans.
     Annoying as the idea may be, the question is valid given the planet"s growing population and limited resource
s, Robert Vale said. 
     "Issues about sustainability are increasingly becoming things that are going to require us to make choices
which are as difficult as eating your dog. It"s not just about changing your light bulbs or taking a cloth bag to
the supermarket," he said.
     "It"s about much more challenging and difficult issues," he added. "Once you see where cats and dogs fit
in your overall balance of things, you might decide to have the cat but not also to have the two cars and the
three bathrooms and be a meat eater yourself."

1. The authors gave their book the playful title to _____. [     ]
A. make it amusing
B. create a vivid image
C. show writing skills
D. arouse people"s concern 2. In Paragraph 3 the writer mainly wants to tell us _____. [     ]
A. the amount of consumed land
B. the neglected ecological impact
C. some familiar examples
D. some actual figures 3. What does "sustainability" mean according to the passage? [     ]
A. Going vegetarian.
B. Raising cats and dogs.
C. Using a cloth bag.
D. Keeping a greener life. 4. Who may not like the idea of "recycling" pet animals? [     ]
A. Manufacturers.
B. Drivers.
C. Animal fans.
D. The authorities. 5. What do the authors think of living a sustainable life?[     ]
A. Challenging.
B. Inspiring.
C. Inviting.
D. Touching.
题型:山东省模拟题难度:| 查看答案
阅读理解。     We all know that certain oils are healthier than others, but your oil health goes beyond just the type. The
health of your oil can be related to how you use it too.
     Each type of oil has what is called a "smoke point". The smoke point is the specific temperature at which
the oil starts to break down, or in more technical terms, its molecular structure begins to change. These
molecular changes result in changes in flavor, as well as changes in nutritional value, specifically, the nutritional
value of the oil starts to reduce; changing what once may have been considered an especially healthy oil, like
Olive, into one that is unhealthy.
     The higher an oil"s smoke point is, the higher the temperature of the oil can be. As a result, each type of oil
should be used for the cooking method that is most appropriate to its individual smoke point and heat tolerance.
Here is a quick guide for the next time you reach for your favorite oil.

     Note that the above table represents oils that are refined (精烁). Most oils we buy are refined. Refined oils
tend to have much higher smoke points than when they are unrefined. They also differ in nutrition and flavor,
Unrefined oils are more nutritious and they tend to be much richer in flavor.
     When it comes to extremely high heat cooking, always choose oils which are refined. 1. What determines whether an oil is healthy or not? [     ]
A. Whether it"s refined or not. 
B. Its smoke point.
C. Its molecular.
D. How you use it. 2. Which of the followjng might be a better choice to make a healthy salad?[     ]
A. Refined walnut oil.
B. Safflower oil.
C. Unrefined olive oil.
D. Sunflower oil. 3. Healthy oil can become unhealthy if _____ according to the passage. [     ]
A. you keep it for too long
B. it is heated well beyond its smoke point
C. it is refined
D. its flavor is changed 4. The author wants to tell readers that _____. [     ]
A. oils are related to health
B. oils"value depends on their smoke points
C. "certain oils are healthier" is relative
D. oils" flavor and nutrition are connected
题型:江苏模拟题难度:| 查看答案
阅读理解。     Being the boss might mean more money and challenging work but it can also cause damage to physical
and mental well-being, according to a Canadian study.
     For years studies have shown people in lower-status jobs generally have higher mtes of heart disease
and other illnesses and die earlier than those in higher-status positions while job authority has shown no
relationship with workers" health.
     But University of Toronto researchers, using data from l, 800 US workers, found the health of people
in higher positions is affected by work as they are rnore likely to report conflicts with co-workers and say
work disturbs their home life.
     However the positive aspects of having a power position at work, such as higher status, more pay and
greater indeperldence, seemed to cancel out the negative aspects when it came to people"s physical and
psychological health.
     These latest findings, reported in the journal Social Science & Medicine, suggest that the advantages
and disadvantages authority positions basically cancel each other out, giving the general impression that job
authority has no health effects.
     For the study, the researchers surveyed participants about various aspects of thelr work, life and well-
being. Job authority was judged based on whether a person nlanaged other employees and had power over
hiring, firing and pay.
     Physical health complaints included problems like headaches, body aches, heartburn and tiredness.
Psychological complaints included sleep problems, difficulty concentrating and feelings of sadness, worry
and anxiety.
     "This isn"t to suggest that having authority is "bad"-in fact, we show it has benefits…but lt is lmportant
to identify the negative sides and deal with them," researcher Scott schieman said.
     Schieman said conflicts with co-workers or involvement of work into home life may destroy physical
and mental well-being by creating stress.
     "These are key stressors that can tax individuals" ability to function effectively," Schieman said.1. Work will have a negative effect on job authority"s health probably because _____.[     ]
A. they are not fit for their work
B. they have power over hiring and pay
C. they are faced with severe competition
D. they don"t get on well with their co-workers2. Most people don"t see that bosses have health effects because _____. [     ]
A. their health problems are not serious enough to see
B. they have enough money to keep themselves healthy
C. their problems are quite different from those of workers
D. the advantages and disadvantages of their status work against each other 3. From the passage we can infer that the study aims to _____. [     ]
A. warn people not to be a boss forever
B. remind the boss to deal with bad effects of their work
C. show that having authority is harmful to one"s health
D. prove that being a boss can benefit a 1ot 4. The best title for this passage might be _____. [     ]
A. Lower-status can affect health
B. Authority can affect health
C. Positive aspects of a power position
D. Disadvantages of being a boss
题型:江苏模拟题难度:| 查看答案
阅读理解。                                               Waste to Energy-JUST BURN IT!
     WHY BURN WASTE?
     Waste-to-energy plants generate (产生) enough electricity to supply 2.4 million households in the US. But,
provrding electricity is not the major advantage of waste-to-energy plants. In fact, it costs more to generate
electrlcity at a waste-to-energy plant than it does at a coal, nuclear, or hydropower plant.
     The maior advantage of burning waste is that it considerably reduces the amount of trash going to landfills.
The average American produces more than l,600 pounds of waste a year. If all this waste were landfilled, it
would take more than two cubic yards of landfill space. That"s the volume of a box three feet long, three feet
wide, and six feet high. If that waste were burned, the ashes would fit into a box three feet long, three feet
wide, but only nine inches high!
     Some communities in the Northeast may be running out of land for new landfills. And, since most people
don"t want landfills in their backyards, it has become more difficult to obtain permits to build new landfms.
Taking the country as a whole, the United States has plenty of open space, of course, but it is expensive to
transport garbage a long distance to put it mto a landfill.
TO BURN OR NOT TO BURN?
     Some people are concerned that burning garbage may harm the environment. Like coal plants, waste-to-
energy plants produce air pollution when the fuel is bumed to produce steam or electricity. Burning garbage
releases the chemicals and substances found in the waste. Some chemicals can be a threat to people, the
environment, or both, if they are not properly controlled.
     Some critics of waste-to-energy plants are afraid that burning waste will hamper (妨碍, 阻碍) recycling
programs. If everyone sends their trash to a waste-to-energy plant, they say, there will be little motive to
recycle. Several states have considered or are cons idering banning waste-to-energy plants unless recycling
programs are in place. Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York City have delayed new waste-to-energy
plants, hoping to increase the level of recycling first.
     So, what"s the real story? Can recycling and burning waste coexist? At first glance, recycling and waste-
to-energy seem to be at odds (不一致), but they can actually complement (弥补) each other. That"s because
it makes good sense to recycle some materials, and better sense to burn others.
     Let"s look at aluminum, for example. Aluminum mineral is so expensive to mine that recycling aluminum
more than pays for itself. Burning it produces no energy. So clearly, aluminum is valuable to recycle and not
useful to burn.
     Paper, on the other hand, can either be burned or recycled-it all depends on the price the used paper will
bring. Plastics are another matter. Because plastics are made from petroleum and natural gas, they are excellent
sources of energy for waste-to-energy plants. This is especially true since plastics are not as easy to recycle
as steel, aluminum, or paper.
     Plastics almost always have to be hand sorted and making a product from recycled plastics may cost more
than making it from new materials.
     To burn or not to burn is not really the question. We should use both recycling and waste-to-energy as
alternatives to landfilling.                                                Waste to Energy-JUST BURN IT!
题型:江苏模拟题难度:| 查看答案
版权所有 CopyRight © 2012-2019 超级试练试题库 All Rights Reserved.