题目
作文批改!给点建议!
It is right that university graduates should earn higher salary than less well-educated members.To what extend do you agree or disagree?
正文:There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose to learn,and eventually apply their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
It is right that university graduates should earn higher salary than less well-educated members.To what extend do you agree or disagree?
正文:There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose to learn,and eventually apply their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
提问时间:2021-01-03
答案
应该说你很会考试,至少在模式上,所以文章看起来中规中矩.文章切题,但第一段比较模式化,关键是第三段论证的很仓促,不令人信服,论证清楚才是至少得到6分的基础,另外要稍微加大难度单词和复杂句式的添加.多看看范文,掌握高分作文的特点也很重要!此文是5.5分
There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose /supposedto learn,and eventually apply/ 这个单词比较重复,可以改成理论联系实际 link theory to practice their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely/simply based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
There is much debate surrounding the issue of university graduates being paid more salary than those who have never been to university for further educations.I tend to agree with this statement to a large extend that paying more money to well-educated workers is justified.
To begin with,university graduates contribute more to our society than their less-educated peers both theoretically and practically.Unlilke the practical skills that could be learnt through general work,the theoretical knowledge,which is the driving force behind the productivity,could only be acquired via university education.In fact,the university students should apply themselves and work hard at school to grasp what they are suppose /supposedto learn,and eventually apply/ 这个单词比较重复,可以改成理论联系实际 link theory to practice their theoretical knowldge into practice to boost the industrial productivity.Therefore,their efforts should be highlighted by gaven financial support in terms of their contribution to theoretical and practical developments.
However,some people may argue that it is unjustified that a person's standard of income should just be decided simplely/simply based on his or her standard of education.And,this is often true that a person who has never studied at university still can be a professor at his or her job and then earn high salary.I personally think only a few people can achieve the top of their professions without university education.If they do achieve it,they surely should be highly paid.
In conclution,a good payment for the university graduates,I think,is reasonable.In addition,the less-educated workers should also have the same treatment as long as his or her contribution is as valued as his or her well-educated colleagues.
举一反三
已知函数f(x)=x,g(x)=alnx,a∈R.若曲线y=f(x)与曲线y=g(x)相交,且在交点处有相同的切线,求a的值和该切线方程.
我想写一篇关于奥巴马的演讲的文章,写哪一篇好呢?为什么好
奥巴马演讲不用看稿子.为什么中国领导演讲要看?
想找英语初三上学期的首字母填空练习……
英语翻译
最新试题
热门考点
- 1the king 2hearts英语翻译是什么意思
- 2你能求出电扇的扇叶转动一圈的轨迹的长是多少吗?怎么求?_.
- 3语数英练习题
- 4高科技发展公司投资500万元,成功研制出一种市场需求量较大的高科技替代产品,并投入资金1500万元作为固定投资,已知生产每件产品的成本是40元.在销售过程中发现:当销售单价定为100
- 5已知sin(a)+sin(b)=0.5^0.5,求cos(a)+cos(b)和的取值范围
- 6甲堆煤的质量的7/3与乙堆煤质量的2倍相等,甲与乙两堆煤比是().比值是().
- 7词根、词缀与词尾的区别?构词词缀和构形词缀的区别?
- 8形容做事坚持不懈的格言,要有作者!急死了!
- 9将0.1molHcl充分溶解在1L水中,溶质的物质的量浓度为什么不等于0.
- 10一块面积为800的等腰梯形的彩纸做风筝