题目

英语翻译
what then is the difference between the two cases insofar as rate of output is concerned?(an assertion that I plan to defend in more detail ),provided that Mr.M and Mr.H can be excluded from consuming the publlic good if they fail to pay for it,which,of course,is implicitly assumed to be ture in the joint supply problem.
There is nothing in the public good concept that disallows the ability to exclude.Frequently,there is confusion between the public good concept,as I understand it,which states that it is possible at no cost for additional persons to enjoy that name unit of a public good,and a different concept ,that might be identified as a collective good ,which imposes the stronger condition that it is impossible to exclude nonpurchasers from consuming the good.The technology of morden weaponry may in fact make it difficult to exclude nonpurchasers from benefiting from national defense purchases ,and national defense might be termd an "approximate public good." Ability t

提问时间：2020-08-07

答案

那么,假如M先生和H先生没有付出代价就不该享受公共利益——这一点在联合供应问题中是大家心照不宣的事实——如果要考虑到产出率（这一推断我将给出更详细的论述）,这两者有何区别?在公共利益的概念中,没有哪一条会说...