题目
哪位好心人帮我翻译一下英文谢谢,不要用机器翻译可以吗
Finding all patents relevant to a particular invention in
the vast amount of documents available in the many existing
patent databases is a difficult task. Moreover, missing just a single relevant patent, and thus violating intellectual
property (IP) rights of others, can be very expensive for
a company when introducing a new product on the market
that uses an already patented technology. Thus, professional
patent searchers are forced to read (or at least skim
through) all retrieved documents, because the relevant one
could be at the bottom of the search result list. This clearly
contrasts Web users posing ad-hoc queries to Web search
engines who hardly ever look further than at the ten topranked
results. Patent classification systems such as the
International Patent Classification (IPC) maintained by the
World Intellectual Property (WIPO) are important structural
instruments for organizing patents i
Finding all patents relevant to a particular invention in
the vast amount of documents available in the many existing
patent databases is a difficult task. Moreover, missing just a single relevant patent, and thus violating intellectual
property (IP) rights of others, can be very expensive for
a company when introducing a new product on the market
that uses an already patented technology. Thus, professional
patent searchers are forced to read (or at least skim
through) all retrieved documents, because the relevant one
could be at the bottom of the search result list. This clearly
contrasts Web users posing ad-hoc queries to Web search
engines who hardly ever look further than at the ten topranked
results. Patent classification systems such as the
International Patent Classification (IPC) maintained by the
World Intellectual Property (WIPO) are important structural
instruments for organizing patents i
提问时间:2020-07-27
答案
Finding all patents relevant to a particular invention in
the vast amount of documents available in the many existing
patent databases is a difficult task.Moreover,missing just a single relevant patent,and thus violating intellectual
property (IP) rights of others,can be very expensive for
a company when introducing a new product on the market
that uses an already patented technology.Thus,professional
patent searchers are forced to read (or at least skim
through) all retrieved documents,because the relevant one
could be at the bottom of the search result list.This clearly
contrasts Web users posing ad-hoc queries to Web search
engines who hardly ever look further than at the ten topranked
results.Patent classification systems such as the
International Patent Classification (IPC) maintained by the
World Intellectual Property (WIPO) are important structural
instruments for organizing patents into taxonomies of
technology domains.These taxonomies allow searchers to
constrain search queries to particular technological fields in
order to reduce the amount of documents to be read.
However,these classification schemes have been built by
experts for experts.A more general taxonomy would make
it easier for non-expert users of patent information systems
to access and navigate through the information space.Such
non-experts might not be familiar with the definitions of the
section,classes and subclasses,groups and subgroups contained
in the IPC,but usually are familiar with the subject
matter of the invention or an idea itself,i.e.the scientific
background.To this end,we have created such a taxonomy,
the Wikipedia Science Ontology (WikiSCION),based
on the Wikipedia Science Portal,which is a well-maintained
starting point for a top-down discovery of Science as topic of
interest and its many subtopics.The Wikipedia can be seen
as a source of knowledge crafted,shaped and maintained
by a large community agreeing on a language that is supposed
to be easier to comprehend by non-experts.We have
developed a method for automatically assigning patent documents
to the classes of this taxonomy,and thus enriching
the patents with additional meta-information.
the vast amount of documents available in the many existing
patent databases is a difficult task.Moreover,missing just a single relevant patent,and thus violating intellectual
property (IP) rights of others,can be very expensive for
a company when introducing a new product on the market
that uses an already patented technology.Thus,professional
patent searchers are forced to read (or at least skim
through) all retrieved documents,because the relevant one
could be at the bottom of the search result list.This clearly
contrasts Web users posing ad-hoc queries to Web search
engines who hardly ever look further than at the ten topranked
results.Patent classification systems such as the
International Patent Classification (IPC) maintained by the
World Intellectual Property (WIPO) are important structural
instruments for organizing patents into taxonomies of
technology domains.These taxonomies allow searchers to
constrain search queries to particular technological fields in
order to reduce the amount of documents to be read.
However,these classification schemes have been built by
experts for experts.A more general taxonomy would make
it easier for non-expert users of patent information systems
to access and navigate through the information space.Such
non-experts might not be familiar with the definitions of the
section,classes and subclasses,groups and subgroups contained
in the IPC,but usually are familiar with the subject
matter of the invention or an idea itself,i.e.the scientific
background.To this end,we have created such a taxonomy,
the Wikipedia Science Ontology (WikiSCION),based
on the Wikipedia Science Portal,which is a well-maintained
starting point for a top-down discovery of Science as topic of
interest and its many subtopics.The Wikipedia can be seen
as a source of knowledge crafted,shaped and maintained
by a large community agreeing on a language that is supposed
to be easier to comprehend by non-experts.We have
developed a method for automatically assigning patent documents
to the classes of this taxonomy,and thus enriching
the patents with additional meta-information.
举一反三
已知函数f(x)=x,g(x)=alnx,a∈R.若曲线y=f(x)与曲线y=g(x)相交,且在交点处有相同的切线,求a的值和该切线方程.
我想写一篇关于奥巴马的演讲的文章,写哪一篇好呢?为什么好
奥巴马演讲不用看稿子.为什么中国领导演讲要看?
想找英语初三上学期的首字母填空练习……
英语翻译
最新试题
- 1二氧化硫溶于水是溶解还是反应?
- 2What is Cultural Relativism?
- 3有哪位知道素数和质数的区别吗?
- 4动词原形和现在时态,在句子中如何区分?
- 50.40[(10-0.40X)/0.32]+0.32X=10-0.56 此方程怎么解? 要的是过程 不要一步解
- 6在计算(X+Y)(X-2Y)-MY(NX-Y)(M、N均为常数)的值,在把X、Y的值代入计算的时候,粗心的小民和小亮都把Y的值看错了,但结果都等于25.细心地小敏把正确的X、Y代入计算,结果恰好也是2
- 7买2瓶白酒,12瓶啤酒共付42元,已知一瓶白酒与8瓶啤酒的价钱相等,每瓶白酒和啤酒各多少元,
- 8由 感恩的心这首歌的歌词,你想到了什么人或什么事写一篇作文
- 9小学六年快乐英语第八课I am going to the zoo是将来时还是进行时
- 10英语At last the fire were put out 改错
热门考点
- 1某宾馆有50个房间供游客住宿,当每个房间的房价为每天180元时,房间会全部住满.当...
- 2运用社会主义市场经济知识,分析市场与政府在促进文化发展中的作用?
- 3山居秋暝诗中描写秋季什么时段的景色
- 4使用受潮而膨胀了的木尺测量物体的长度,结果比真实值大还是小,还是一样?
- 5如图,BC=2/3AC,O是线段AC的中点,若OC=1cm,则AB=_.
- 6在一个400m的环形跑道上A,B两人相距100m(如下图),两人分别以每分钟6m和每分钟4m的速度同时出发.他们出发后
- 7谓语是什么?分析一下句型里面有没有定语从句 through can transmit 的成分
- 8选择
- 9英语和数学相比,你更喜欢哪门学科英语翻译.用比较级句式
- 10麻烦你们帮我修改我造的英语句子..是写故事的.所以要用的时态都必须的过去时的对不